Most of the most important public policy conversations don’t happen at the State Capitol. They happen in meeting rooms, restaurants, community centers, and other gathering places across Iowa, where people simply want to better understand the issues affecting their families and communities.
Recently, ITR Foundation Policy Director John Hendrickson was invited to St. Charles to speak with Iowans about two tax issues that are generating headlines in Iowa and across the country. The first was Iowa’s Taxpayer Protection Amendment, which voters will decide on November 3.
The proposed constitutional amendment would require a two-thirds vote in both the Iowa House and Senate before lawmakers could increase the individual or corporate income tax or create a new income-based tax. John explained that Iowa would hardly be alone in requiring greater consensus before lawmakers raise taxes. At least 16 states have some form of supermajority requirement for tax increases, including states across the political spectrum.
The idea also enjoys broad support among Iowans. ITR Foundation’s June polling found nearly 74 percent of Iowa voters support requiring a two-thirds legislative vote to increase income taxes, including 72 percent of independents and 60 percent of Democrats.
That discussion naturally connected with another issue receiving considerable attention: property taxes.
In May, Iowa lawmakers delivered a sweeping property tax reform law designed to place greater restraint on the growth of local government spending and property tax collections. But Iowa isn’t the only state wrestling with the issue. Florida has become one of the most closely watched examples. Governor Ron DeSantis initially called for eliminating property taxes for homeowners, helping fuel a national conversation about whether property taxes could, or should, be eliminated altogether.
What Florida voters will actually consider this November is much more limited.
The proposal would substantially increase Florida’s homestead exemption, eliminating most non-school property taxes for some homeowners and reducing them for many others. School property taxes, which often represent 40 to 50 percent of a homeowner’s total property tax bill, would remain. In other words, a discussion that began with eliminating property taxes has evolved into eliminating some property taxes for some Floridians.
That evolution illustrates why these conversations matter. Tax policy can become complicated very quickly. Proposals that sound simple in a headline often involve important questions about government spending, who pays, which taxes are affected, and whether reducing one source of revenue simply creates pressure to increase another.
Helping Iowans work through those questions is an important part of what we do. Much of ITR Foundation’s work involves researching public policy, analyzing legislation, writing about complicated tax issues, talking with reporters, and providing policymakers with information. But research is most valuable when it leaves the office and reaches the people affected by those policies.
That is why we appreciate it when Iowans invite us into their communities to lead these discussions. Whether the subject is an amendment to the Iowa Constitution, the latest property tax proposal from Florida, or what is happening at the Iowa State Capitol, our goal is the same: provide clear information, put policy proposals into context, and help taxpayers understand what they mean.
We’re grateful that Iowans continue to turn to ITR Foundation as a trusted source for those conversations and we’re always ready for the next one.
Print a PDF