The Fight Over America’s Institutions is a Test of Our Republic

A prediction of Supreme Court expansion sparks a deeper debate about whether sweeping institutional reforms align with or undermine the constitutional framework the Founders designed.
America was built as a republic, not a pure democracy, with federalism, separation of powers, the Electoral College, and an independent judiciary intentionally structured to restrain majority impulses and protect liberty.
Modern proposals to reshape long-standing institutions, from court packing to weakening states’ authority, reflect frustration with constitutional guardrails, but those guardrails are essential to preserving the republic “if we can keep it.”

Gratitude for the Forgotten Mayflower Compact

In November 1620, after arriving in Cape Cod, the Pilgrims signed the Mayflower Compact before setting foot on land. Though often overlooked today, the Compact remains a foundational document in the development of American constitutionalism and self-government. Constitutional scholar James McClellan wrote that by adopting the Compact, the Pilgrims brought a contractual theory of government to the New World—an idea that would later influence colonial charters, state constitutions, and even the U.S. Constitution itself.
This Thanksgiving, remembering the Mayflower Compact highlights the deep historical roots of American freedom and why these early commitments to self-rule remain a blessing worth celebrating.

America is Turning 250, but Debt is Pushing Independence Away

The U.S. is preparing to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, yet rising national debt and dependence on foreign supply chains, especially China, threaten America’s economic independence.
Without major reforms, the U.S. faces soaring interest costs, impending insolvency in major entitlement programs, and reduced federal support for states, including Iowa, which relies heavily on federal funds.

Rebates or Restraint With Tariff Revenue?

President Trump is considering $2,000 tariff-funded rebate checks to help Americans with affordability challenges, but the plan risks worsening inflation and adds long-term uncertainty amid already severe federal debt and deficits. For long-term economic growth, policymakers should focus on pro-growth measures such as spending cuts, deregulation, energy expansion, and responsible tax policy rather than short-term cash payments that echo past inflation-driving stimulus efforts.

Iowans Want Lower Property Taxes—Local Governments Must Change Course

Iowans overwhelmingly want property tax relief, with 72% supporting a 2% cap on total property tax collections, signaling broad bipartisan demand for reform. Local government spending is the primary driver of rising property taxes, meaning any effective reform must focus on controlling spending and improving efficiency. Governor Reynolds is urging local governments to follow the state’s example by consolidating services, modernizing operations, and adopting cost-saving measures—because without meaningful spending restraint, tax relief will remain out of reach.

Taxing Out-of-State Landowners May Feel Good—but It’s Unconstitutional

Proposals to tax out-of-state landowners at higher rates may sound appealing, but they raise significant concerns about fairness, economic consequences, and constitutionality. The U.S. Constitution—through the Privileges and Immunities Clause, Equal Protection Clause, and Commerce Clause—prohibits states from disadvantaging non-residents in property taxation, and courts have repeatedly struck down similar attempts. Real property-tax relief in Iowa will not come from targeting certain groups of taxpayers but from tackling the true source of rising tax bills: unchecked local government spending.

The Lone Star Blueprint for Fixing Property Taxes

Texas Governor Greg Abbott has made property tax reform the centerpiece of his reelection campaign, emphasizing that meaningful relief is impossible without controlling local government spending. Abbott’s proposed reforms—including strict spending caps, a two-thirds voter requirement for tax increases, and a rollback election option—aim to curb runaway local budgets and increase taxpayer protections. Iowa lawmakers, preparing their own 2026 property tax reform efforts, can draw lessons from Texas: real relief requires limiting local spending, improving transparency, and preventing workarounds that bypass voter accountability.

Iowa Depends on Washington—and That’s a Problem We Can Fix

True fiscal strength means standing on our own two feet—by knowing where every federal dollar goes, demanding transparency, and reasserting control within our own borders. The Iowa Fiscal Independence Act is the path toward lasting autonomy, responsible government, and a stronger future for Iowa taxpayers. For years, Iowans for Tax Relief Foundation has warned that Iowa’s growing reliance on Washington’s money would come with consequences. When the flow of federal dollars slows or stops, programs stall, services falter, and state budgets are left to pick up the pieces.

Fitch Warns States to Prepare for Reduced Federal Support

Fitch Ratings warns that Washington’s growing debt and spending reductions are pushing more fiscal responsibilities—like SNAP and Medicaid costs—onto state governments, exposing them to greater financial risk. Iowa remains fiscally strong thanks to conservative budgeting, but with 34% of its revenue tied to federal funds, changes from the “One Big Beautiful Bill” and future federal austerity could strain state finances. To safeguard Iowa’s independence and long-term stability, policymakers must prepare for shrinking federal aid, limit spending growth, and reinforce the constitutional balance of federalism.

Iowa depends on Washington – and that’s a problem we can fix

For years, Iowans for Tax Relief Foundation has warned that Iowa’s growing reliance on Washington’s money would come with consequences. When the flow of federal dollars slows or stops, programs stall, services falter, and state budgets are left to pick up the pieces. Those warnings have proved correct. From federal policy changes in President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill to the current government shutdown, Iowa is learning what happens when dependence replaces discipline.

Rebuilding Civic Knowledge for the Next Generation

Reflecting on his early education, President Calvin Coolidge wrote that in his studies he “was attracted to civil government.” He recalled:
“This was my first introduction to the Constitution of the United States. Although I was but thirteen years old, the subject interested me exceedingly. The study of it which I then began never ceased, and the more I study it, the more I have come to admire it, realizing that no other document devised by the hand of man ever brought so much progress and happiness to humanity. The good it has wrought can never be measured.”
The education Coolidge received was very different from what most students—especially those in public schools—receive today. The importance of studying American history, government, and Western civilization can no longer be sidelined. Too often, discussions about education focus solely on spending, finance, or the promotion of STEM programs—science, technology, engineering, and math.
Of course, students need a curriculum that prepares them for higher education and the workforce. But education must also do more—it should prepare students to be informed, responsible citizens. Education is not just about acquiring skills; it is about citizenship.
For decades, the nation has faced a civic education crisis. Students are leaving K–12 schools and colleges with an alarming lack of understanding of American history, government, and Western civilization. Too often, civics instruction has become politicized, with curricula emphasizing narrow or revisionist viewpoints rather than a balanced appreciation of our shared history.
As a result, many young people are developing shallow or distorted views of America’s founding principles and institutions. Classrooms increasingly frame citizenship in global rather than national terms, and higher education is often dominated by a limited range of political and cultural perspectives.
In response, the Iowa Legislature has acted to strengthen civic education and refocus instruction on the values of liberty, republican self-government, and civic virtue that define the American tradition. In 2024, lawmakers directed a revision of the state’s social studies standards to ensure those principles are emphasized throughout the curriculum. The standards remain under review, but the goal is clear: reinforce rigorous instruction in American history, government, and Western civilization so that every Iowa student gains a deeper understanding of what it means to be an informed citizen.
The Legislature also required all high school students to pass the U.S. citizenship exam before graduation. This modest measure at least ensures that students demonstrate a basic understanding of our nation’s founding and institutions. Iowa already requires high school students to complete a course in civics prior to graduation, but strengthening the standards in the curriculum is essential to reversing the decline.
When it comes to higher education the situation is different. Iowa’s Regent Universities do not require a course in civic education to graduate. Further, the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal notes that Iowa’s flagship institution, the University of Iowa, is absent from the list of the “most civically aligned teacher preparation programs.”
America’s civic ignorance contributes to its deep divisions. Patrick J. Buchanan warned in The Death of the West:
“How does one sever a people’s roots? Destroy its memory. Deny a people the knowledge of who they are and where they came from… Destroy the record of a people’s past, leave it in ignorance of who its ancestors were and what they did, and one can fill the empty vessels of their souls with a new history.”
Political philosopher Russell Kirk echoed this sentiment, writing that “ignorance is a dangerous luxury” and that Americans who lack understanding of their nation’s principles “will be susceptible to ideologies and endanger the moral security of the nation.”
This civic decay explains why anti-American sentiment is rising among young people—and why so many now embrace socialism and even communism. How can constitutional principles like federalism or the Electoral College survive if they are no longer taught or understood?
This doesn’t mean avoiding difficult chapters in our history, such as slavery. In fact, Americans have a duty to develop an informed knowledge of history and institutions. As author James S. Robbins wrote in Erasing America, “History is the source of all life’s lessons, the good and the bad. We turn to history to see what to embrace and what to avoid.”
Civic education must be about more than memorizing facts. It should cultivate responsible citizens, not activists. It should inspire patriotism, respect for America’s heritage, and a lifelong desire to learn—just as it did for Coolidge. We owe it to both our ancestors and future generations to preserve our Republic and its ideals.
It’s time to restore that lesson to our schools and to heed the advice President Ronald Reagan provided us, “Let’s start with some basics: more attention to American history and a greater emphasis on civic ritual.

Iowa’s Flat Tax Success Should Inspire the Next Chapter of Reform

Over six years, Iowa has climbed from 44th to 17th in the Tax Foundation’s competitiveness rankings—proof that years of conservative budgeting and tax reform have turned one of America’s least-friendly tax codes into a national model.
Governor Kim Reynolds’ 3.8% flat income tax, paired with falling corporate rates and a strong Taxpayer Relief Fund, has made Iowa a regional leader for growth and investment—outpacing neighboring states and inspiring others like Georgia to follow suit.
To sustain its momentum, Iowa must address high property taxes, apply the same spending discipline at the local level, responsibly lower the flat rate using revenue triggers, and safeguard taxpayer protections to keep its pro-growth policies permanent.

Is federalism the cause of our national ills?

In two opinion essays for Governing, Stephen Legomsky, a law professor emeritus at Washington University and author of “Reimagining the American Union,” argues that many of the nation’s political problems are a direct result of federalism. The root of those problems, he contends, lies with the states. Yet a closer reading of his essays suggests the issue runs much deeper than federalism itself. His argument continues the progressive movement’s long campaign to fundamentally alter American constitutionalism.

Efficiency, Consolidation, and Spending Control: DOGE Task Force’s Final Report

Governor Kim Reynolds’ effort to make government more efficient took another major step forward with the release of the final report from the Iowa Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Task Force. Announced during her 2025 Condition of the State Address, the Task Force was charged with finding new ways to streamline government, modernize operations, and ultimately reduce Iowa’s property tax burden.

Avoid the D.C. Dysfunction: Iowa Needs a “No Shutdown” Rule

Federal Dysfunction, Local Lesson: As Washington’s government shutdown drags on, it highlights the risk of partisan gridlock — something Iowa must guard against in its own budgeting process.

Budget Continuity Needed: Without clear rules, an Iowa budget impasse could threaten key services. A budget-continuation or automatic continuing resolution would ensure government operations continue smoothly until a new budget is passed.

Limit Political Games: Establishing a budget-continuity policy would prevent Iowa from mirroring the fiscal dysfunction seen in Washington and other states. Neither a governor nor the legislature could use the threat of a shutdown as political leverage.

Are Tariffs Socialist?

President Donald Trump has stirred the hornet’s nest with his preference for tariffs. The President has even described the word “tariff” as one of the most beautiful words in the English language. Perhaps more than any other policy, including immigration, President Trump’s protectionism is the most controversial. For many within the conservative movement, tariffs are a betrayal of free-market economics and a rejection of the “true spirit” of Reagan conservatism. Further, protectionism is often assumed to be a policy favored by progressives and socialists.

Iowa’s Quiet Conservative: Senate Majority Leader Jack Whitver

Describing his policy objectives, Senator Whitver has said, “In one sentence, here’s the plan: cut taxes, control spending, reform government, and let Iowans be great.” In 2024, Governing magazine honored Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds as “Public Official of the Year” for her numerous policy achievements — including historic tax reform, parental choice in education, state government reform, and defending traditional values. For two years, the CATO Institute honored Governor Reynolds as the most fiscally conservative governor in the nation. Perhaps her most-significant award has come from voters, who expanded Republican majorities in state government.

Iowa’s quiet conservative: Senate Majority Leader Jack Whitver

In 2024, Governing magazine honored Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds as “Public Official of the Year” for her numerous policy achievements — including historic tax reform, parental choice in education, state government reform, and defending traditional values. For two years, the CATO Institute honored Governor Reynolds as the most fiscally conservative governor in the nation. Perhaps her most-significant award has come from voters, who expanded Republican majorities in state government.

What the Old Right Teaches us on Constitution Day  

Conservatives of the 1920s viewed the Constitution as the enduring foundation of American liberty, emphasizing limited government, federalism, and the need to preserve timeless principles rather than treat the document as obsolete. They rejected the progressive notion of a “living Constitution,” instead describing it as an anchor—flexible through amendment, but grounded in unchanging truths and rooted in prudence. These conservatives believed Americans have a duty to safeguard the Constitution. Through education, civic responsibility, and vigilance against drift, liberty can be protected for future generations.

Honoring Patrick J. Buchanan

Recently, I had the honor of signing a coalition letter recommending President Donald Trump award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Patrick J. Buchanan. The call to honor Mr. Buchanan with this high honor is not new but accelerated when Representative Riley M. Moore (R-WV) sent a letter to President Trump urging him to honor Buchanan with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. This effort is also being supported by Dr. Kevin Roberts, President of The Heritage Foundation.

Kim Reynolds is America’s ‘Iron Lady’ reflecting Margaret Thatcher’s spirit

Gov. Kim Reynolds is a conservative leader who knows what she believes and has the courage to defend her values and convictions. “One of the great debates of our time is about how much of your money should be spent by the State and how much you should keep to spend on your family. Let us never forget this fundamental truth: the State has no source of money other than money which people earn themselves. If the State wishes to spend more it can do so only by borrowing your savings or by taxing you more. It is no good thinking that someone else will pay — that “someone else” is you. There is no such thing as public money; there is only taxpayers’ money,” stated British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

Gov. Reynolds channels the conviction of Margaret Thatcher

“One of the great debates of our time is about how much of your money should be spent by the State and how much you should keep to spend on your family. Let us never forget this fundamental truth: the State has no source of money other than money which people earn themselves. If the State wishes to spend more it can do so only by borrowing your savings or by taxing you more. It is no good thinking that someone else will pay – that ‘someone else’ is you. There is no such thing as public money; there is only taxpayers’ money,” stated Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

Iowa’s Path Forward Requires the Resolve of an Iron Lady

“There is no such thing as public money; there is only taxpayers’ money,” stated former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

That timeless truth should guide Iowa policymakers as they approach the challenge of property tax reform. Across the nation, states are stumbling over how to address property taxes. A common excuse is that the system is both technical and complicated. Iowa’s property tax system is indeed technical and complicated—but that cannot be an excuse to delay or prevent reform.

Federal Spending Cuts and the Real Threat to Liberty

As part of his effort to reduce federal spending, President Donald Trump directed his administration to scrutinize budgets and cut unnecessary programs. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recommended eliminating $1 million in grant funding for the University of Iowa’s International Writing Program (IWP), which had received federal support for more than 58 years.

The IWP is described “the oldest and largest multicultural writing residency in the world.” With federal funds eliminated, the University turned to private donations, grants, gifts, and even foreign support to keep the program alive, ultimately sponsoring 23 international writers.