Enrollment Numbers Offer Insight into Iowa School Funding

Student enrollment declined in 2025: Iowa’s K–12 enrollment in public, charter, and private schools fell by about 1 percent in 2025, driven primarily by a 1.5 percent drop—more than 7,000 students—in public school enrollment. Public school trends drive overall enrollment, not private school growth: While private school enrollment increased modestly in 2025, those gains account for only about one-third of the students lost by public schools, making clear that private schools are not the primary cause of declining public school enrollment. Long-term forces matter more than single-year shifts: Enrollment trends reflect broader demographic and policy factors—including declining birth rates, post-COVID adjustments, open enrollment, and family schooling choices—underscoring the importance of focusing on long-term patterns rather than year-to-year changes.

Taxes, Turnout, and the Power of Participation

In November 2025, Iowa voters weighed in on 58 local bond proposals, which directly affect property tax bills for up to 20 years, with turnout significantly higher than in other local races. Average turnout for bond elections was 37.1%, more than double the statewide average for city and school elections, suggesting voters engage more when long-term tax impacts are clear. Higher voter participation leads to more representative outcomes in bond elections, reinforcing the importance of transparency and engagement in decisions that commit communities to long-term spending.

Understanding Iowa’s School Income Surtax

Iowa’s school income surtax, first adopted in 1971, is a district-level tax calculated as a percentage of a taxpayer’s Iowa income tax liability and used to support discretionary school programs.
Districts may combine the surtax with property taxes to fund the Instructional Support Levy (ISL) and the voter-approved Physical Plant and Equipment Levy (PPEL), adjusting the surtax rate annually to meet budget needs.
Over the past twenty years, the number of districts not using the surtax has steadily declined, making it an increasingly common but still little-understood part of Iowa’s school finance system.

Iowa Districts Must Look Ahead as Enrollment Patterns Evolve

Iowa’s K–12 enrollment is declining as birth rates fall and fewer young families move into the state, and that trend is expected to continue for at least the next decade. Enrollment drives school funding, which means shrinking student counts—especially in small districts—create financial pressure and push more districts onto the “budget guarantee,” shifting costs onto local property taxpayers. Districts must start planning now by right-sizing staff, facilities, and services, improving transparency around funding, and preparing for long-term enrollment declines to protect both students and taxpayers.

From Pilgrims to Property Taxes

America’s earliest settlers believed government existed only to protect natural rights—especially property—not to manage society. Families, churches, and communities handled most social needs through voluntary cooperation, cultivating a citizenry capable of self-rule.
This founding worldview clashes with today’s rising property-tax burdens. Drawing on John Locke’s social-contract theory, the article argues that when government taxes away the fruits of a family’s labor or threatens their ability to stay in their home, it violates the very purpose for which government was created.

Iowa Still Winning the Tax Rivalry with Nebraska

Iowa outperforms Nebraska on tax policy, climbing rapidly in national competitiveness rankings thanks to major tax reforms, while Nebraska continues to lag behind in several key categories.

Iowa’s pro-growth tax “playbook”—including a flat 3.8% income tax, elimination of retirement income and inheritance taxes—has strengthened its economic position and attracted migration from neighboring states like Nebraska.

Despite Iowa’s strong lead, vulnerabilities such as high property taxes remain, underscoring the need for continued reform to maintain Iowa’s competitive edge.

Voters Show Restraint in 2025 Bond Elections

Iowa voters considered 58 bond proposals totaling more than $1.7 billion in potential new borrowing. A majority (57%) of those proposals failed, with only 25 proposals (43%) gaining approval. Many repeat proposals were rejected again, showing continued taxpayer concern about property taxes and government spending. Just over $1 billion in new debt was approved, with nearly $700 million denied.

Per-Pupil Spending Tells More of the Story

School bond campaigns often highlight levy rates to suggest affordability, but that figure alone doesn’t reveal how districts spend—or the true cost to taxpayers and students. Looking at districtwide per-student expenditures provides a clearer picture of financial trends and priorities. For instance, Des Moines’ per-student spending is up 24% in five years, and Southeast Polk’s has risen 66%. Districts should routinely publish per-student cost data by program or activity to help voters, taxpayers, and educators evaluate whether new borrowing truly delivers educational value.

Iowa’s Absenteeism Challenge: Reconnecting Students to Learning

Regular attendance is one of the most important predictors of student success. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we saw firsthand how inconsistent attendance undermined learning, lowered test scores, and set back student achievement across the country. Chronic absenteeism is defined as missing 10% or more of scheduled school days or instructional hours during a grading period. In an 180-day school year, that’s 18 or more missed days. Across the United States, chronic absenteeism surged from 15% in 2018 to 28% in 2022. Although some states have recovered from pandemic-era highs, many remain above pre-pandemic levels — and Iowa is no exception.

Schools Must Fund Learning Before Luxuries

Schools have a core mission: to educate students. In every facet of life, a mission should guide how funds are spent. In education, that means every dollar should first support teaching and learning needs. Only after those needs are met should districts fund what’s considered “extra.” Unfortunately, that prioritization may not be happening in the Atlantic Community School District (CSD).

During 2025, the Atlantic CSD Board of Education decided to commit $18.5 million of its future 1-cent sales tax revenue—known as SAVE—for a new multipurpose indoor sports practice facility at Atlantic High School.

As Washington Fumbles, Iowa Needs a Backup Plan

The federal government shutdown has now stretched into its second week, with no clear end in sight. The Senate has failed multiple times to advance temporary funding measures, and both parties continue to trade blame. While Washington’s politicians argue, states like Iowa are left dealing with the fallout.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen dysfunction in D.C., and it likely won’t be the last. But for Iowans, the shutdown is a sharp reminder of just how dependent our state and local governments have become on federal money.

Upcoming November 2025 Bond Elections

Iowa’s November 2025 city and school elections are quickly approaching, and voters will see 53 bond proposals on ballots across the state. Altogether, these measures seek approval for more than $1.5 billion in new borrowing.

It’s important to remember that local governments repay debt with property taxes. While some districts claim they will “keep the rate the same,” the reality is that property taxes will still be higher than they otherwise would be—often for the next two decades.

What is the Instructional Support Levy (ISL)?

The Instructional Support Levy (ISL) is one of the main tools available to Iowa school districts to supplement state funding for educational programs. While the state sets limits on how much can be spent per student, the ISL provides districts with a way to go beyond that cap—funding additional staff, classroom resources, and other instructional needs. Because the levy can significantly affect local property taxes and school budgets, it is important for school board members, parents, and community members to understand how it works and how it is implemented.

All Measures Passed in September Special Election—But Few Iowans Voted

The results are in: every public measure on September 9, 2025, ballot passed across the state. That is notable, but the real headline should be the persistently low voter turnout in these September special elections—and whether it’s time to eliminate them altogether. On September 9, seven public measures appeared statewide. Three renewed the Physical Plant and Equipment Property Tax Levy (PPEL) for another ten years, while others asked whether districts could continue using the one-cent sales tax for school infrastructure (RPS) and whether the City of Swan should remain incorporated.

What is the Physical Plant and Equipment Levy (PPEL)?

Frequently referred to as PPEL, this property tax is used by a majority of school districts amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars each year to pay for infrastructure. n Iowa, a PPEL (Physical Plant and Equipment Levy) is a property tax used by most school districts to spend on infrastructure and equipment, including:

School building construction, repairs, and maintenance
Purchase of technology and equipment
Transportation (e.g., school buses)
Safety and security improvements

Spotlight on Iowa’s September 9, 2025 Special Elections

On September 9, Iowans will head to the polls for a series of important—though often overlooked—special elections. Unlike last year, when 21 local governments had property tax questions on the ballot, this year’s special elections are significantly less. Only three school districts—West Delaware County, Carlisle, and Sheldon—are asking voters to renew a property tax levy dedicated to school infrastructure.

Dollars Over Optics: Rethinking Local Government Spending

Despite falling property tax rates, cities like Jefferson, Iowa are quietly expanding spending and government roles, creating the illusion of fiscal restraint while drifting from core responsibilities due to vague missions and unnecessary projects.

Across Iowa, local leaders often point proudly to declining property tax rates as evidence of fiscal responsibility. But what those numbers hide is the quiet rise in actual government spending — and a fundamental shift in how cities define their role. The City of Jefferson offers a clear example of this disconnect between perception and reality.

Iowa’s Back-to-School Sales Tax Holiday: A Missed Opportunity?

Limited Scope, Misplaced Focus: Iowa’s sales tax holiday offers short-term savings on clothing but excludes essential school supplies like backpacks, notebooks, and calculators—items families actually need for back-to-school.

Inconsistent with Regional Trends: While Iowa clings to its sales tax holiday, most neighboring states have eliminated theirs, signaling a broader shift away from such exemptions in favor of more stable, broad-based tax systems.

Weakens Tax Reform Efforts: The holiday erodes Iowa’s sales tax base at a time when the state is pursuing a simpler, flatter tax code on other fronts.

Outdated and Ineffective: Policy experts across the spectrum agree tax holidays are politically popular but economically unsound, offering more optics than impact.

The Price of Public Education in Iowa

What Iowa’s $11.5 Billion in School Funding Reveals in a Post-SCOTUS Landscape

Each year, the Iowa legislature revisits the question of how much funding to allocate toward K–12 public education. At the same time, property taxpayers review proposed spending requests from their local school districts. And not to be left out, the federal government invests in K-12 education in Iowa, too. Now, with the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling curbing the power of federal agencies—and renewed discussion about dismantling the U.S. Department of Education—questions about control and funding have taken on new urgency. With so many funding sources and moving parts, one key question remains: How much money do Iowa’s public schools actually receive—and where does it come from?

Taxpayers (and Students) Deserve Quality Outcomes

How school districts spend our tax dollars is important to watch—but just as important is understanding what taxpayers are getting in return. K-12 education is the largest consumer of Iowa’s General Fund revenues (such as income and sales taxes) and local property tax dollars. With such a significant investment, Iowans deserve to see strong academic outcomes. Unfortunately, too many of Iowa’s public schools are spending large sums of money while student proficiency in core subjects like math and reading remains unacceptably low.

A Tax Revolt Then—and Now

How the American Revolution’s fight over taxation without representation still echoes in today’s battle against rising property taxes in Iowa.

As we gather each July 4th for fireworks, pool parties, cookouts, and time with family, it’s easy to forget what the holiday actually commemorates: a revolution sparked, in large part, by a tax fight.

While Independence Day celebrates the birth of a new nation, the catalyst for that bold break from Britain wasn’t just lofty ideas of liberty, it was taxation without representation. What began with protests in Boston soon became a widespread colonial movement. Today in Iowa, we face a different but equally pressing tax problem: one of consent, accountability, and runaway property taxes, now exceeding $7 billion in 2025.

Understanding Preemption: What Iowa’s New Fireworks Law Means for Local Governments

The fireworks law may seem like a small matter, but it serves as a powerful example of how preemption works—and why it’s important for local governments to stay informed and responsive to changes at the state level.

Iowa cities and counties enjoy a great deal of autonomy in managing their local affairs thanks to what’s known as “home rule.” Iowa’s constitution grants home rule authority to cities and counties, which means they have broad power to govern themselves. However, this authority is not absolute. One key limitation is that local governments cannot enact ordinances that conflict with state law.

Iowa’s Dependency on Federal Funds: A Growing Concern

Local governments in Iowa have grown increasingly reliant on federal funding. Since 2009, cities across the state have received an average of $416 million annually from federal sources. In fiscal year 2025 alone, Iowa cities took in $545 million in federal dollars—forming a significant share of their total revenue. At first glance, this might seem like a win for local taxpayers. After all, federal funds appear to reduce the need for higher property taxes.

But nothing is ever truly free.

Nebraska’s Fiscal Crisis Is a Roadmap for What Iowa Must Avoid

Nebraska’s proximity to Iowa provides a sterling example of how taxpayers can win as state’s put forth competing tax policies.  In response to Iowa’s shrinking income tax rates and retirement-tax elimination, Nebraska’s legislature enacted significant income tax cuts of their own in 2023 to remain competitive with their neighbors to the east. But they failed to balance these cuts with corresponding spending restraint — a critical oversight that has led to financial distress.