The Constitution: The Political Religion of the Nation

 

“Hold on to the Constitution of the United States of America and the republic for which it stands. What has happened once in six thousand years may never happen again. Hold on to your Constitution, for if the American Constitution shall fail there will be anarchy throughout the world.”

-Daniel Webster

 

“It is good to meet and drink at the fountains of wisdom inherited from the Founding Fathers of the republic.”

-President Warren G. Harding

 

“At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide,” stated a young Abraham Lincoln in 1838. Lincoln was addressing the growing strife that was occurring during the 1830s, but he also was reminding his listeners about the importance of the rule of law and the Constitution.

Today, our nation is experiencing similar problems with escalating unrest and a disregard for the rule of law. To make matters worse our nation is undergoing a crisis in civic education. If our republic is to survive, we must relearn and recommit to the principles of the American Founding. Lincoln described the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as the “political religion of the nation.”  These principles, Lincoln argued, must be taught and learned “in schools, in seminaries, and in colleges; let it be written in Primers, spelling books, and in Almanacs;--let it be preached from the pulpit, proclaimed in legislative halls, and enforced in courts of justice…”

President Calvin Coolidge serves as an example for us today to emulate as an individual who made the principles of the American Founding the cornerstone of his life. In his Autobiography, Calvin Coolidge described an early memory of his education which led to his interest in the Constitution. Coolidge wrote:

For some reason I was attracted to civil government and took that. This was my first introduction to the Constitution of the United States. Although I was but thirteen years old the subject interested me exceedingly. The study of it which I then began has never ceased, and the more I study it the more I have come to admire it, realizing that no other document devised by the hand of man ever brought so much progress and happiness to humanity.

During the decade of the 1920s, or what became known as the Republican Ascendancy, a conservative direction descended on American politics. In the presidential election of 1920 the electorate rejected the progressive philosophy of President Woodrow Wilson and elected Ohio Senator Warren G. Harding as President. The Harding administration initiated a period of constitutional conservatism which battled against the progressive philosophy of the administrative state and the “living” Constitution.

Political historian Morton Keller adequately described the conservative belief toward the Constitution during the 1920s as “a veritable cult of Constitution worship.” President Warren G. Harding, Vice President and later President Calvin Coolidge, Chief Justice William Howard Taft, President Herbert Hoover, among others all fit into this mold of upholding and applying the Constitution to public policy.

Constitutional historian Melvin I. Urofsky described the 1920s “as a battleground between traditionalists fearful of the new ways and modernists eager to shed the shackles of older ideas and practices.”  At the center of this battle was the Constitution and whether the Constitution was a document that limited the role of government or evolved and changed to meet the challenges of the 20th century by giving the federal government more power.

It was in this debate that Calvin Coolidge became a central player defending the Constitution, limited government, and economic liberty against the progressive impulse to create a stronger federal government through an activist administrative state as promoted by former Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson.

The Constitution was a guide for Coolidge and his administration. “It is a fundamental principle of our country that the people are sovereign. While they recognize the undeniable authority of the state, they have established as its instrument a Government of limited powers, argued Coolidge.” His policies reflected this philosophy. Whether it was spending and tax reduction, defending property rights, tariff policy, immigration, foreign policy, among other areas, Coolidge reflected a constitutional approach to public policy. As historian Paul Moreno wrote, “as President, he [Coolidge] often observed that demands for unconstitutional federal laws arose from the states’ failure to act…”  In fact, some scholars have argued that he was “America’s last constitutional President.”

Coolidge also understood that the principles of the American Founding — both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution — do not change or alter from decade to decade as the progressives argued. As Coolidge stated:

It is often asserted that the world has made a great deal of progress since 1776, that we have had new thoughts and experiences which have given us a great advance over the people of that day, and that we may therefore very well discard their conclusions for something more modern. But that reasoning cannot be applied to this great charter. If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions.

Just as with the Founders, Coolidge also believed that in order for the Constitution and self-government to survive, the people had to be vigilant in its preservation and knowledgeable about American history and institutions.  Coolidge argued that “to support the Constitution, to observe the laws, is to be true to our own higher nature. That is the path, and the only path, towards liberty. To resist them and violate them is to become enemies to ourselves and instruments of our own destruction.”

In writing the “foreword” to James M. Beck’s, The Constitution of the United States, Coolidge wrote, “it is of first importance that the study of the Constitution should be essential part of the education of the American youth.”  He also warned that “the Constitution is not self-perpetuating:”

If it is to survive, it will be because it has public support…The Constitution of the United States is the final refuge of every right that is enjoyed by any American. So long as it is observed, those rights will be secure. Whenever it falls into disrespect or disrepute, the end of orderly organized government, as we have known it for more than one hundred and twenty-five years, will be at hand. The Constitution represents a government of law. There is only one other form of authority, and that is a government of force. Americans must make their choice between these two. One signifies justice and liberty; the other tyranny and oppression. To live under the American Constitution is the greatest political privilege that was ever accorded to the human race.

Historian John Van Til wrote that Coolidge’s “thought life had two principal features,” which centered on a Christian worldview and a “deep devotion to the Founding Fathers and their achievements in creating the American System, its substance being on display in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.”

These were the values that made Coolidge’s presidency not only a success, but an example for policymakers to follow today. Calvin Coolidge’s commitment to the Constitution and the principles of the American Founding is also a vital lesson and warning for the nation to take to heart in our current era.